<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can PI Ever Be Considered IP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exponere.com/2010/can-pi-ever-be-considered-ip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exponere.com/2010/can-pi-ever-be-considered-ip/</link>
	<description>sharing stuff that @barneyc finds interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarinette</title>
		<link>http://www.exponere.com/2010/can-pi-ever-be-considered-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>clarinette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponere.com/?p=421#comment-89</guid>
		<description>On the question of PI considered as Copyright, the criteria is :&lt;br&gt;1st- requirement of a recording or fixation of the information;&lt;br&gt;2nd- Originality which means it must &#039;originates&#039; from the author as it most be the expression of its original or inventive thought;&lt;br&gt;3rd- AND most importantly in the case of PI, it must be certain that a certain amount of labour, skill or effort must have been expended in the creation of the work recording the personal information.&lt;br&gt;We are not talking here about derivative or compilation work non applicable here.&lt;br&gt;If these criteria were found, the support of the personal information could be protected under copyright law but I wouldn&#039;t think in itself a PI could be protected under copyright law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the question of PI considered as Copyright, the criteria is :<br />1st- requirement of a recording or fixation of the information;<br />2nd- Originality which means it must &#39;originates&#39; from the author as it most be the expression of its original or inventive thought;<br />3rd- AND most importantly in the case of PI, it must be certain that a certain amount of labour, skill or effort must have been expended in the creation of the work recording the personal information.<br />We are not talking here about derivative or compilation work non applicable here.<br />If these criteria were found, the support of the personal information could be protected under copyright law but I wouldn&#39;t think in itself a PI could be protected under copyright law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Can PI Ever Be Considered IP? &#124; expōnere -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.exponere.com/2010/can-pi-ever-be-considered-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Can PI Ever Be Considered IP? &#124; expōnere -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponere.com/?p=421#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by clarinette and Barney Craggs, Barney Craggs. Barney Craggs said: Can PI Ever Be Considered IP? http://ff.im/-fAyqX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by clarinette and Barney Craggs, Barney Craggs. Barney Craggs said: Can PI Ever Be Considered IP? <a href="http://ff.im/-fAyqX" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-fAyqX</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
